DUI INFORMATION
The specific criminal offense may be called driving while intoxicated (DWI), driving while impaired (also DWI), operating while intoxicated (OWI), operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OMVI), driving under the influence [of alcohol or other drugs] (DUI), driving under the combined influence of alcohol and/or other drugs, driving under the influence per se or drunk in charge [of a vehicle] depending on the jurisdiction. These laws can also apply to boating, piloting aircraft, and even bicycling in some states such as California.
TESTS ESTABLISHING DUI
In the past, guilt was established by observed driving symptoms, such as weaving. If an officer suspects impairment a field sobriety test, such as walking a straight line heel-to-toe or standing on one leg for 30 seconds may be given at which time the officer can give a subjective opinion of one’s impairment. Starting with the introduction in Norway in 1936 the world’s first per se law which made it an offense to drive with more than a specified amount of alcohol in the body, objective chemical tests have gradually supplemented the earlier purely judgmental ones. Limits for chemical tests are specific for blood alcohol concentration or concentration of alcohol in breath.
Today’s statues commonly provide for two separate and distinct criminal offenses. The first is the traditional “drunk driving” offense, consisting of driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs. Evidence to support this crime generally comes from the officer’s observations (such as erratic driving, slurred speech, unsteady gait,), performance on field sobriety tests, and a legal (and generally rebuttable) presumption of intoxication from a blood alcohol test result over the legal limit. The second offense is the more recent so-called “per se” offense: rather than focusing on impairment the crime consists entirely of having a given blood alcohol content (BAC) at the time of driving, regardless of the individual’s tolerance to alcohol. Since 2002 it has been illegal in all 50 US states to drive with a BAC that is 0.08% or higher. Both offenses may be charged, and the defendant may be convicted of both; if a blood alcohol test result was not obtained, only the traditional “DUI” offense will be charged.
OPEN CONTAINER
Driving while consuming alcohol is generally illegal, though driving after drinking remains legal. In California, it is also illegal for an open container of an alcoholic beverage to be in the passenger compartment of a motor vehicle or in some specific area of that compartment.
Are you ready to leave this problem behind?
Send a messageMEET OUR TEAM
Our law firm provides honest, thoughtful, clear, and effective guidance and support to our clients. We will lead you through the difficult times and help you secure your future.
This firm is a "unicorn." Honest, dedicated, and kind, as well as excellent and honorable in their practice.
He listened to my concerns and is willing to go the extra mile. He is really knowledgeable and responds quickly.
Thanks to David and Daniel, my life is back on track.
Caring and professional attorneys that will do whatever they can to help you legally, and whatever they can offer you after the fact. They are exemplary human beings and both deserve recognition for all of their efforts in every happenstance.
David has provided awesome support during some of our darkest days. Even went out of his way to help my son get into programs. David is very well connected. If you need effective and immediate legal counsel he should be the first attorney you call.
He actually takes the time to listen to you and make you feel like you matter.
David is fantastic. He gives you everything he has, he cares, thinks soooo fast on his feet, and is very intelligent.
David was very professional, direct, informative and no BS. He has a great reputation. I spoke with a LOT of other individuals who have had legal troubles, David Lehr was the most often recommended Lawyer and he has an excellent track record.
David Lehr not only represented me thoroughly, effectively, and honestly but he also gave great thought, concern, and insight to my needs. He handled my affairs promptly and I found success in all areas of his dealings. I could not have had a better lawyer. I am forever grateful.